Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is place in its place.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Female tend not to approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they might cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the final 14 days. The following information is obtainable for Every single case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, together with signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They may be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it truly is actually rather obscure about whether the 90-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the 90-day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons obtaining their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling over the same style of case.
Are you presently looking for Court Information? You can utilize our site to search for just a case or search for any person. Information over the site is updated every 24 hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found over the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
Carrying out a case regulation search may be as easy as entering specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, including:
Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, such as Congress at both the federal and state levels. Though this form of legislation strives to condition our society, delivering rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the website relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.